This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Illustration of neural network highlighting neurons involved in addiction, focusing on synapses affected by opioid use, depicting the complex brain activity linked to substance dependence
  • Home
  • /
  • News
  • /
  • News trends
  • /
  • Opioid analgesics: the same, but different
Original Medthority Content

Opioid analgesics: the same, but different

Last updated:9th Apr 2024
Published:9th Apr 2024
Author: Article by Simon van Rysewyk, PhD; Associate Director (Medical Writing) at EPG Health

Challenges in using opioids for chronic pain

Opioids for chronic pain – a flawed concept

The benefits to patients of increasing opioid use for cancer-related pain in the 1990s led to suggestions that these benefits could be achieved for patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP).1 This thought led to a significant increase in opioid use for CNCP in the US, Canada and Australia.2-4 However, as described below, the simple transmission of practices for cancer pain treatment to the treatment of CNCP was misguided.5

Poor outcomes for opioids in chronic noncancer pain

Managing the complexity of the biopsychosocial experience of CNCP with opioids did not benefit many patients, especially with long-term opioid use.6,7 In some patients with CNCP, long-term opioid treatment of CNCP can limit pain relief and delay improvement in function and quality of life.7,8 These poor outcomes have been confirmed across many studies.9,10

Opioid-induced hyperalgesia can increase central sensitisation, which worsens pain in many patients with CNCP, especially those on high doses of opioids.11 Further, adverse outcomes caused by opioid-induced androgen deficiency (OPIAD) leading to hypogonadotropic hypogonadism with low testosterone levels and conditions such as weight gain, decreased muscle mass, fatigue and depression, further worsen the quality of life of patients with CNCP.12

Limitations of conventional mu-agonist opioids

Conventional mu-agonist opioids suppress immune function, which can increase infection risk.13 The potential risk of opioid-induced ventilatory impairment (OIVI), increasing mortality in users of opioids, is dose-dependent, and increases when attempts to manage CNCP lead to excessive dosing.14 Physical dependence, misuse, abuse, and the development of addiction in vulnerable patients is a challenge in countries with high opioid prescribing for CNCP.15

Harmful consequences on society of extreme opioid use

The practice of prescribing opioids for people with CNCP has harmed society.16 Increased diversion of prescription opioids into the black market and an increase in deaths are linked with prescription opioid misuse and abuse.17,18Similar trends have been observed in France, Canada, US and Australia.2-4,19

The same, but different

It has been suggested that the “categorisation of all analgesics that have any component of opioid mechanism of action into the same class is anachronistic.”20

There is a distinction between conventional (or classical) opioids, with their mechanism of action based on mu-opioid receptor agonism, from non-conventional opioids, which have multiple mechanisms of action (opioid and non-opioid).21The molecules buprenorphine, tramadol and tapentadol satisfy this characterisation of non-conventional opioids.22

Buprenorphine, tramadol, tapentadol

Three non-conventional opioids, buprenorphine, tramadol and tapentadol, are approved for CNCP.23-25 Compared with conventional opioids in the CNCP setting, buprenorphine, tramadol and tapentadol have achieved:

  • Better function and quality of life26-28
  • Fewer serious adverse effects on immune and endocrine function, lower rates of adverse gastrointestinal effects, a reduced risk of OIVI, in high doses29-31
  • A lower abuse potential and a lower risk of misuse, abuse, and diversion into black markets32-34

Non-conventional opioids offer additional options for managing chronic pain23-25 

References

  1. Melzack R. The tragedy of needless pain. Sci Am. 1990;262:27–33.
  2. Okie S. A flood of opioids, a rising tide of deaths. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1981–1985.
  3. Häuser W, Schug S, Furlan AD. The opioid epidemic and national guidelines for opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain: a perspective from different continents. PAIN Reports. 2017;2:e599.
  4. Dufort A, Samaan Z. Problematic Opioid Use Among Older Adults: Epidemiology, Adverse Outcomes and Treatment Considerations. Drugs Aging. 2021;38(12):1043–1053.
  5. Sullivan M, Ballantyne J. The Right to Pain Relief and Other Deep Roots of the Opioid Epidemic. London: Oxford University Press; 2023.
  6. Carr DB, Bradshaw YS. Time to flip the pain curriculum? Anesthesiology. 2014;120:12–14.
  7. Chou R, Hartung D, Turner J, Blazina I, Chan B, Levander X, et al. Opioid treatments for chronic pain. 2020. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556253/.
  8. Bialas P, Maier C, Klose P, Häuser W. Efficacy and harms of long‐term opioid therapy in chronic non‐cancer pain: Systematic review and meta‐analysis of open‐label extension trials with a study duration≥ 26 weeks. Euro J Pain. 2020;24(2):265–278.
  9. Leung J, Santo Jr T, Colledge-Frisby S, Mekonen T, Thomson K, Degenhardt L, et al. Mood and anxiety symptoms in persons taking prescription opioids: a systematic review with meta-analyses of longitudinal studies. Pain Med. 2022;23(8):1442–1456.
  10. Nury E, Schmucker C, Nagavci B, Motschall E, Nitschke K, Schulte E, et al. Efficacy and safety of strong opioids for chronic noncancer pain and chronic low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Pain. 2022;163(4):610–636.
  11. Guichard L, Hirve A, Demiri M, Martinez V. Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in patients with chronic pain: a systematic review of published cases. Clin J Pain. 2022;38(1):49–57.
  12. Ho KW. Opioid-induced androgen deficiency (OPIAD): prevalence, consequence, and efficacy of testosterone replacement. Curr Opin Endo Metabol Res. 2019;6:54–59.
  13. Ninkovic J, Roy S. Role of the mu-opioid receptor in opioid modulation of immune function. Amino Acids. 2013;45:9–24.
  14. Vowles KE, McEntee ML, Julnes PS, Frohe T, Ney JP, van der Goes DN. Rates of opioid misuse, abuse, and addiction in chronic pain: a systematic review and data synthesis. Pain. 2015;156:569–576.
  15. Voon P, Karamouzian M, Kerr T. Chronic pain and opioid misuse: a review of reviews. Subst Abuse Treat Prevent Policy. 2017;12(1).
  16. Paris J, Rowley C, Frank RG. The economic impact of the opioid epidemic. 2023. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-economic-impact-of-the-opioid-epidemic/. Accessed August 2, 2023.
  17. Schatman ME, Ziegler SJ. Pain management, prescription opioid mortality, and the CDC: is the devil in the data? J Pain Res. 2017;10:2489–2495.
  18. Stoicea N, Costa A, Periel L, Uribe A, Weaver T, Bergese SD. Current perspectives on the opioid crisis in the US healthcare system: a comprehensive literature review. Medicine. 2019;98(20).
  19. Guillou-Landreat M, Quinio B, Le Reste JY, Le Goff D, Fonsecca J, Grall-Bronnec MDA. Analgesic opioid misuse and opioid use disorder among patients with chronic non-cancer pain and prescribed opioids in a pain centre in France. Internat J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):2097.
  20. Raffa RB. On subclasses of opioid analgesics. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30:2579–2584.
  21. Raffa RB, Pergolizzi JV, Taylor R, Ossipov MH, Group. NR. Nature's first “atypical opioids”: Kratom and mitragynines. J clin pharm thera. 2018;43(3):437–441.
  22. Schug SA. The atypical opioids buprenorphine, tramadol and tapentadol. Med Today. 2019;20(1):31–36.
  23. BELBUCA® (buprenorphine buccal film). Highlights of Prescribing Information. 2022. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2022/207932s019s020lbl.pdf.
  24. ULTRAM® (tramadol hydrochloride). Highlights of Prescribing Information. 2019. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/020281s045lbl.pdf.
  25. NUCYNTA® (tapentadol). Highlights of Prescribing Information. 2019. Available at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/022304s022lbl.pdf.
  26. Khanna IK, Pillarisetti S. Buprenorphine - an attractive opioid with underutilized potential in treatment of chronic pain. J Pain Res. 2015;8:859–870.
  27. Schug SA. The role of tramadol in current treatment strategies for musculoskeletal pain. Thera clin risk manag. 2007;3(5):717–723.
  28. Riemsma R, Forbes C, Harker J, Worthy G, Misso K, Schäfer M, et al. Systematic review of tapentadol in chronic severe pain. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27(10):1907–1930.
  29. Yee A, Loh HS, Loh HH, Riahi S, Ng CG, Sulaiman AHB. A comparison of sexual desire in opiate-dependent men receiving methadone and buprenorphine maintenance treatment. Ann Gen Psych. 2019;18(1).
  30. Baron R, Jansen JP, Binder A, Pombo‐Suarez M, Kennes L, Müller M, et al. Tolerability, Safety, and Quality of Life with Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Compared with Oxycodone/Naloxone PR in Patients with Severe Chronic Low Back Pain with a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Controlled, Open‐label, Phase 3b/4 Trial. Pain Practice. 2016;16(5):600–619.
  31. Rizk MM, Herzog S, Dugad S, Stanley B. Suicide Risk and Addiction: The Impact of Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorders. Curr Addict Reports. 2021;8(2):194–207.
  32. Vosburg SK, Severtson SG, Dart RC, Cicero TJ, Kurtz SP, Parrino MW, et al. Assessment of tapentadol API abuse liability with the researched abuse, diversion and addiction-related surveillance system. J Pain. 2018;19: 439–453.
  33. Dunn KE, Bergeria CL, Huhn AS, Strain EC. A systematic review of laboratory evidence for the abuse potential of tramadol in humans. Frontiers Psych. 2019;10:704.
  34. Roux P, Sullivan MA, Cohen J, Fugon L, Jones JD, Vosburg SK, et al. Buprenorphine/naloxone as a promising therapeutic option for opioid abusing patients with chronic pain: Reduction of pain, opioid withdrawal symptoms, and abuse liability of oral oxycodone. Pain. 2013;154(8):1442–1448.
Welcome: