This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Journals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • Sleep Apnea
  • /
  • Surgical modifications of the upper airway for obs...
Journal

Surgical modifications of the upper airway for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Read time: 1 mins
Published:30th Sep 2010
Author: Caples SM, Rowley JA, Prinsell JR, Pallanch JF, Elamin MB, Katz SG et al.
Source: Sleep
Availability: Free full text
Ref.:Sleep. 2010 Oct;33(10):1396-407.
DOI:10.1093/sleep/33.10.1396
Surgical modifications of the upper airway for obstructive sleep apnea in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis


A substantial portion of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) seek alternatives to positive airway pressure (PAP), the usual first-line treatment for the disorder. One option is upper airway surgery. As an adjunct to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) Standards of Practice paper, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature reporting outcomes following various upper airway surgeries for the treatment of OSA in adults, including maxillomandibular advancement (MMA), pharyngeal surgeries such as uvulopharyngopalatoplasty (UPPP), laser assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), as well as multi-level and multi-phased procedures. We found that the published literature is comprised primarily of case series, with few controlled trials and varying approaches to pre-operative evaluation and post-operative follow-up. We include surgical morbidity and adverse events where reported but these were not systematically analyzed. Utilizing the ratio of means method, we used the change in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) as the primary measure of efficacy. Substantial and consistent reductions in the AHI were observed following MMA; adverse events were uncommonly reported. Outcomes following pharyngeal surgeries were less consistent; adverse events were reported more commonly. Papers describing positive outcomes associated with newer pharyngeal techniques and multi-level procedures performed in small samples of patients appear promising. Further research is needed to better clarify patient selection, as well as efficacy and safety of upper airway surgery in those with OSA.


Read abstract on library site    Access full article