This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Journals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • Regional enteritis and ulcerative colitis
  • /
  • Golimumab effectiveness and safety in clinical pra...
Journal

Golimumab effectiveness and safety in clinical practice for moderately active ulcerative colitis

Read time: 1 mins
Published:1st Sep 2018
Author: O'Connell J, Rowan C, Stack R, Harkin G, Parihar V, Chan G et al.
Availability: Pay for access, or by subscription
Ref.:Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018.
DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001177
Golimumab effectiveness and safety in clinical practice for moderately active ulcerative colitis


Background and aims:
Golimumab (GLB) is an antitumour necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF) therapy that has shown efficacy as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis (UC). We aimed to describe the outcome of GLB therapy for UC in a real-world clinical practice.

Patients and methods: Consecutive patients receiving GLB for UC in six Irish Academic Medical Centres were identified. The primary study endpoint was the 6-month corticosteroid-free remission rate. The secondary endpoints included the 3-month clinical response, time free of GLB discontinuation and adverse events.

Results: Seventy-two patients were identified [57% men; median (range) age of 41.4 years (20.3-76.8); disease duration 6.6 years (0-29.9); follow-up 8.7 months (0.4-39.2)]. Sixty-four percent of patients were anti-TNF naive. The 3-month clinical response and the 6-month corticosteroid-free remission rates were 55 and 39%, respectively. Forty-four percent of patients discontinued GLB during the follow-up, median (95% confidence interval) time to GLB discontinuation 18.7 months (9.2-28.1). A C-reactive protein more than 5 mg/l at baseline was associated with failure to achieve 6-month corticosteroid-free remission and a shorter time to GLB discontinuation, odds ratio 0.2 (0.1-0.7), P=0.008, and hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 2.8 (1.3-5.7), P=0.007, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 7% of patients (n=5), all of which were minor and self-limiting.

Conclusion: These real-world clinical data suggest that GLB is an effective and safe therapy for a UC cohort with significant previous anti-TNF exposure. An elevated baseline C-reactive protein, likely reflective of increased inflammatory burden, is associated with a reduced likelihood of a successful outcome of GLB therapy.


Read abstract on library site  Access full article