In an attempt to standardise and improve patient outcomes in the ICU, a variety of guidelines have been produced. Some of the latest guidelines can be found in this section.
Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gélinas C, Dasta JF, et al.,
Crit Care Med. 2013;41(1):263–306
- A central principle of the 2013 guidelines is the importance of managing pain, agitation/sedation and delirium (PAD) in critically ill patients in an integrated and interdisciplinary fashion
- These guidelines highlight that the first step in the management of an ICU patient is to control pain, then to control agitation and delirium
- Compared with previous versions of these guidelines, the 2013 PAD guidelines are more evidence-based and patient-centred
- This guideline has been widely accepted
- The guidelines advocate an 'assess, treat, prevent' approach to PAD management
- It is suggested that analgesia-first sedation be used in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients
- PAD guidelines recommend that pain, agitation and delirium should be routinely monitored
- They also suggest that sedatives should be titrated to promote a light level of sedation rather than deep sedation
- Early mobilisation should be performed whenever feasible to reduce the incidence and duration of delirium
GMS German Medical Science – an Interdisciplinary Journal
- This German guideline is the only country-specific comprehensive PAD management guidance to date
- Evidence used to formulate the guideline recommendations was reviewed and approved by representatives of 17 German national societies
- This guideline is intended for all ICU professionals, and encompasses all critically ill patient populations
- Recommends the use of light sedation for all suitable patients with a target RASS level of 0/-1
- Proposes a new nomenclature for sedation as a RASS score ≤-2 with RASS scores of 0/-1 no longer classified as sedation although they may be achieved using sedatives
- Suggests the routine use of nonpharmacological delirium prevention strategies for all ICU patients
- The routine monitoring of pain, sedation and delirium is recommended
Vincent JL, Shehabi Y, Walsh TS, Pandharipande PP, Ball JA, Spronk P, et al.
Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:962–71.
- eCASH stands for early comfort using analgesia, minimal sedatives and maximal humane care
- A proposed concept that provides an integrated and adaptable approach to improving patient care in the ICU
- The protocol suggests the use of effective analgesia and light sedation as a priority early in critical care
- It represents an evolution of the PAD guidelines with a strong focus on the promotion of sleep, early mobilisation and improved communication between patients, staff and relatives
- Click here to view an interview with Professor Jean-Louis Vincent discussing the benefits of using the eCASH concept
- An approach to align and coordinate care in the ICU based on the PAD management guidelines
- It was developed by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement in the USA
- Provides a suggested method to implement best practice at the ICU ward level
The 2018 PADIS guidelines represent the updated and expanded version of the 2013 PAD guidelines offering additional guidance on rehabilitation/mobility and sleep.
- Thirty-two international experts, including for the first time a critical illness survivor, have updated and expanded upon the 2013 clinical guidelines
- The guidelines contain 37 recommendations derived from actionable patient, intervention, comparison and outcome questions (PICO), two good practice statements and 32 ungraded statements
- The level of evidence available means only two of the 37 recommendations are strong; most are conditional
- In addition to recommendations and suggestions, the guidelines provide rationales for their statements and identify ongoing evidence gaps that need to be addressed
- The 2018 PADIS guidelines advocate that analgesia must take priority over sedation, both to control pain and to avoid sedative overuse
Additional guidance on the implementation of the PADIS guidelines in clinical practice has also been published, highlighting potential barriers and identifying possible solutions (Balas et al., 2018).
View all the works cited in the Guidelines section of the PAD Management Knowledge Centre.