Analysis of cost effectiveness of Besremi in Polycythemia Vera published in Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research.- PharmaEssentia

The analysis, titled “Cost-Effectiveness of Ropeginterferon Alfa-2b-njft for the Treatment of Polycythemia Vera,” showed that ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft provided a cost-effective benefit for a broad range of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) versus first-line hydroxyurea followed by ruxolitinib. Cost effectiveness was demonstrated in a modeled population including both low- and high-risk patients receiving first- or second-line treatment with ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft.

This new study used an economic model developed from the United States healthcare system perspective. Inputs were informed by the data from randomized clinical trials, including the PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV studies, and from real-world sources. The model compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft used either as first- or second-line therapy versus an alternative treatment pathway of first-line hydroxyurea followed by ruxolitinib. To reflect the long-term consequences of treating PV, results were presented over a lifetime horizon.

Findings from the study conclude ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft is a cost-effective treatment option for a broad range of patients with PV, including both low- and high-risk patients and patients with and without prior cytoreductive treatment with hydroxyurea. Of note: These data show that over the modeled lifetime, patients who receive ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft have more years alive (0.4), higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (0.4), and higher cost ($60,175) as compared to the alternative treatment pathway. Weighing the additional costs versus the additional QALY gains results in a cost per QALY of $141,783. This cost per QALY is less than a standard willingness to pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY8. In this study, treating patients at a younger age or those with low-risk disease led to more cost-effective results, suggesting that earlier initiation of treatment of PV with effective therapy can translate to more favorable cost to benefit ratios. The model was sensitive to treatment costs, the percentage of patients who discontinue hydroxyurea, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users who switch to monthly dosing, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users as 2nd line treatment, and the treatment response rates.

The full benefits of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft may not be fully captured in the model, and in particular, data on disutility of phlebotomy are lacking. Although some patients may tolerate regular phlebotomies, others can experience iron deficiency which can negatively impact quality of life. While the results from a scenario analysis incorporating a small decrement in utility had minimal impact on the cost-effectiveness results, due to the lack of data in this area, this estimate remains conservative. This study took a U.S. healthcare perspective, and the results may not generalize to other countries given the differences in healthcare resource use, costs and cost-effectiveness thresholds.

See: "Cost–effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft for the treatment of polycythemia vera" Aaron T Gerds et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 2nd August 2023 https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2023-0066