Phase III CLL11 study of Gazyva shows impact on survival in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.- Roche.

Roche announced data from the final analysis of the phase III CLL11 study evaluating Gazyva/Gazyvaro (obinutuzumab)-based treatment in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) which demonstrates that Gazyva/Gazyvaro extends the lives of people versus alternative therapy. After a follow-up of nearly five years, final results showed clinically meaningful improvements with Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil across multiple endpoints, including progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), when compared head-to-head with MabThera/Rituxan (rituximab) plus chlorambucil. Gazyva/Gazyvaro-based treatment reduced the risk of death by 24% compared to MabThera/Rituxan-based treatment (median OS not reached vs. 73.1 months).

Data also showed a reduction in the risk of disease progression or death of 51% for patients treated with Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil versus those treated with MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil (median PFS 28.9 vs. 15.7 months, HR= 0.49; 95% CI 0.41-0.58; p<0.0001). In addition there was a clinically meaningful improvement in OS for patients receiving Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil compared to MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil. At the time of final analysis the median OS in the Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil arm was not yet reached which means that more than half of these patients were still alive after nearly five years. A 24% reduction in the risk of death was observed with Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil treatment (median OS not reached vs. 73.1 months, HR= 0.76; 95% CI 0.60-0.97; p<0.0245). It also showed a prolonged time to initiation of the next therapy (time to new treatment; TTNT) with Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil (median 56.4 vs. 34.9 months, Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil vs. MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil, HR= 0.58; 95% CI 0.46-0.73; p<0.0001).

Patients treated with Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil achieved a higher rate of minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity versus those treated with MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil (24% vs. 2% of patients MRD-negative, Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil vs. MabThera/Rituxan plus chlorambucil). Being MRD negative means no cancer can be detected in the blood and or bone marrow using a sensitive test. No new or unexpected safety concerns for the combination of Gazyva/Gazyvaro plus chlorambucil. These new data add to the growing body of evidence for the OS benefit with Gazyva/Gazyvaro in first-line CLL after the previously reported OS benefit with Gazyva/Gazyvaro combined with chlorambucil versus chlorambucil alone. Data will be presented at the 23rd European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Congress.