In the preamble to their recent paper “Development and testing of a goals of care intervention in advanced heart failure” [Appl Nurs Res. 2017;38:99-106] Professor Cynthia M Dougherty and colleagues outline an array of options for the treatment of advanced heart failure (HF) that create – quite reasonably – the impression that we are in a golden age of therapeutic possibilities for this difficult condition: recurrent parenteral infusions, implanted ventricular assist devices and cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac transplantation, and the total artificial heart.
But is a life dominated by this panoply of interventions in every case what our patients want? Maybe; maybe not: and very likely not the same answer every time. We have a responsibility to identify their goals.
Dougherty and colleagues’ article is a contribution to the expanding science of “goals of care (GoC)”. I am not going to do them the discourtesy of trying to summarise a complex and supple piece of research in this short blog beyond revealing that giving patients’ the skills and confidence to initiate and maintain constructive conversations about what they want from their treatment emerges as a vital aspect of excellence in medical care for advanced heart failure.
In the authors’ own words “Holding a GoC conversation between patient and provider is expected to facilitate concordance between care received and the patient’s values and goals, assist in shared decision making about possible new HF therapies, improve patient-provider communication, and potentially improve quality of life”. We have to note that “is expected”: the outcome we aspire to may not be fully achieved in every case. But to aspire to those outcomes is from every point of view absolutely the right thing to do and I would urge all those involved in the care of patients with advanced heart failure to make a careful study of research on GoC (below are some other recent leads to get you started) and to bring well-founded understanding of patient goals and wishes into the heart of their practice.
Professor Gerhard Pölzl reports primary results from the LION-HEART study in the management of advanced heart failure where among secondary endpoints, patients treated with levosimendan experienced a reduction in the rate of HF-related hospitalisation compared with placebo.
Professor Gerhard Pölzl discusses the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology annual meeting, where several sessions were held on the use of levosimendan in heart failure.
Professor Gerhard Pölzl highlights the LION-Heart and LAICA clinical trials.
Professor Gerhard Pölzl discusses the interplay between the acutely compromised heart and the kidneys and how the optimal treatment for individual cases is complex.
Professor Gerhard Pölzl highlights Hospitalisation for the management of acute decompensation being a critical moment in the trajectory of heart failure (HF) and one that has gloomy prognostic implications for many patients.
The HFA-ESC has issued a fresh position paper [Crespo-Leiro MG et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 May 27. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1236]. Here’s our first take on some highlights.
If we had a way to reduce the risk of life-threatening complications after cardiac surgery would we use it? Of course we would. It is for reason that this blog post highlights the recent work of Dr. Qiang and colleagues. See the details here.
Thoughts from the expert meeting organised by the Heart Failure Clinic, Attikon University Hospital, 2018.
Professor Cynthia M Dougherty and colleagues outline an array of options for the treatment of advanced heart failure (HF) that create – quite reasonably – the impression that we are in a golden age of therapeutic possibilities for this difficult condition.
Alternatively login via
Back to epgonline.org