This site is intended for healthcare professionals
Journals
  • Home
  • /
  • Journals
  • /
  • HIV infection
  • /
  • Doravirine dose selection and 96-week safety and e...
Journal

Doravirine dose selection and 96-week safety and efficacy versus efavirenz in antiretroviral therapy-naive adults with HIV-1 infection in a Phase IIb trial.

Read time: 1 mins
Published:28th Jun 2019
Author: Gatell JM, Morales-Ramirez JO, Hagins DP, Thompson M, Arastéh K, Hoffmann C et al.
Availability: Pay for access, or by subscription
Ref.:Antivir Ther. 2019.
DOI:10.3851/IMP3323
Doravirine dose selection and 96-week safety and efficacy versus efavirenz in antiretroviral therapy-naive adults with HIV-1 infection in a Phase IIb trial


Background:
The safety and efficacy of doravirine were compared with that of efavirenz as initial treatment of adults living with HIV-1 infection (NCT01632345).

Methods: A Phase 2b double-blind trial with participants stratified by screening HIV-1 RNA (≤ or >100 000 copies/ml) and randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive once-daily doravirine (25, 50, 100, or 200 mg) or efavirenz 600 mg (Part I) for up to 96 weeks, with open-label tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg/emtricitabine 200 mg (TDF/FTC). After dose selection at Week 24, doravirine 100 mg was provided to participants receiving the other doses of doravirine and additional participants were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily doravirine 100 mg or efavirenz 600 mg for 96 weeks with TDF/FTC (Part II). Primary outcomes were the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/ml at Week 24, and central nervous system (CNS) adverse events (AEs) by Weeks 8 and 24 (Parts I+II combined).

Results: 210 and 132 participants were randomized in Parts I and II, respectively, and 216 (108 on doravirine 100 mg, 108 on efavirenz) were evaluable for Parts I+II combined. At Week 24, the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/ml was 72.9% for doravirine 100 mg and 73.1% for efavirenz (difference -0.5 [95% CI -12.3–11.2]). In addition, CNS AEs were reported by 26.9% and 47.2% of doravirine and efavirenz recipients, respectively (difference -20.4 [95% CI -32.6 to -7.5], p=0.002).

Conclusions: Doravirine 100 mg with TDF/FTC demonstrated similar antiretroviral activity and superior CNS safety compared with efavirenz 600 mg with TDF/FTC.

 

Read abstract on library site

Access full article