Treatment Options
What are the non-pharmacological means of preventing VTE?
Mechanical methods include:
- Graduated compression stockings (GCS):
GCS apply more pressure at the ankle and less up the leg and closer to the knee. This pressure prevents backflow of blood and clot formation. There are knee-length and thigh-length GCS; they have similar physiological effects but the former is easier to apply and more comfortable.
- Venous foot pumps:
Venous foot pumps stimulate the physiological venous foot pump by means of compressed air supplied by a pump unit through inflatable garments placed around the foot
- Intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC):
IPC apply a controlled pressure to the extremities by means of compressed air supplied by a pump unit through inflatable garments: knee- or thigh-high
- Act by increasing venous outflow and reducing stasis within the leg veins
Indications
- Especially GCS and IPC
- In patients with a high risk of bleeding
- Alone or combined with pharmacological methods
- Require careful attention to proper use and optimal compliance
Table 1. Advantages and Limitations of Mechanical Thromboprophylaxis
| Advantages | Limitations |
| Do not increase the risk of bleeding |
Not as intensively studied as pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis (fewer studies and smaller) |
| Can be used in patients at high bleeding risk |
No established standards for size, pressure, or physiologic features |
| Efficacy has been demonstrated in a number of patient groups |
Many specific mechanical devices have never been assessed in any clinical trial |
| May enhance the effectiveness of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis |
Almost all mechanical thromboprophylaxis trials were unblended and therefore have a potential for bias |
| May reduce leg swelling |
In high-risk groups are less effective than anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis |
| |
Greater effect in reducing calf DVT than proximal DVT |
| |
Effect on PE and death unknown |
| |
May reduce or delay the use of more effective anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis |
| |
Compliance by patients and staff often poor |
| |
Trials may overestimate the protection compared with routine use |
| |
Cost: associated with purchase, storage, dispensing, and cleaning of the devices, as well as ensuring optimal compliance |
Table reference: Geerts et al. Chest 2008; 133; 381-453
Stimulation of venous return is best achieved by walking
Vena cava filters
- Vena cava filters prevent the migration of thrombi into the pulmonary circulation
- Two types: permanent or retrievable
- Generally not used for the primary prevention of VTE
- Indicated for the prevention of PE in patients with DVT in whom anticoagulant treatment is contraindicated or ineffective
- Main drawback: increased risk of DVT and post-thrombotic syndrome following insertion