More NewsEPG Online News
Cervical cancer screening strategy strengths and weaknesses explored in study
01 Oct 2008

The benefits and risks of different cervical cancer prevention approaches could help women to work with their physicians in order to put into practice appropriate screening strategies, it has been suggested.

Published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, the study was led by staff at US academic institution the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston.

The researchers created a computerised model to simulate incidence of cervical cancer and various screening strategies were applied to it, web resource Medical News Today notes.

Scientists involved in the study aimed to identify positive and negative aspects of each technique.

"These strategies pose trade-offs between minimising cancer risk (already small with regular screening) and minimising the risk of false-positive test results and excessive diagnostic procedures," the stated.

Lifetime risk of developing cancer did not significantly vary using different screening techniques, but a plan offering more referrals for colposcopy reduced cancer incidence.

As such, the researchers state each woman should take her personal circumstances into consideration when deciding on the best screening method.

Login and visit the HPV & Cervical Cancer Knowledge CentreADNFCR-1419-ID-18805438-ADNFCR

Print Article    Bookmark Bookmark
Related News Stories (Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer)
Disease Knowledge Centres – evidence based educational and clinical tools written for doctors and physicians
More Results Drugs Relating To Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer

  • CERVARIX - 51.93%
    CERVARIX is indicated for the prevention of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN grades 2 and 3) and cervical cancer causally related to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18. The indication is based on demonstration of efficacy in women aged 15-25 years following vaccination with ...


  • GARDASIL - 42.64%
    Gardasil is a vaccine for the prevention of high-grade cervical dysplasia (CIN 2/3), cervical carcinoma, high-grade vulvar dysplastic lesions (VIN 2/3), and external genital warts (condyloma acuminata) causally related to Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16 and 18. The indication is based on ...


 

Copyright © 2004 European Prescriber Guide
Printed on 09/01/2009 8:36 PM