Disease Knowledge Centres

  • Allergy and Clinical Immunology - Disease Topic Overview

    Allergy is an over-reaction of the body's immune system to innocuous foreign substances or allergens.1 Allergens, by definition, are proteins that have the ability to elicit powerful T helper lymphocyte type 2 (Th2) responses, culminating in IgE antibody production (atopy).2 It has been proposed that allergens are linked by their ability to activate the innate immune system of mucosal surfaces, triggering an initial influx of innate immune cells that subsequently promote Th2-polarized adaptive immune responses.2

    Allergens are derived from a variety of environmental sources, such as plants, fungi, arthropods, and other mammals.2 Allergens constitute a diverse range of molecules, varying in size from small to large multi-domain proteins.2 It should be noted that, reductive experimental systems aside, natural exposure is not to single, purified proteins, but to a complex mixture of molecules.2

    The most common allergies are; allergic rhinitis, asthma, and eczema.3 Symptoms are also very different depending on the affected organ, and can be numerous (pruritus, obstruction and / or nasal rhinorrhea, and oedema).4 Various organs may be affected by the inflammatory response (nose, eyes, skin, ears, respiratory and digestive system).

    The prevalence of allergic diseases has increased dramatically over the past few decades2 and has become a major public health problem. Even if the allergy is mild in most cases, it may negatively impact daily life. 1,4 In order to effectively manage allergies, a diagnosis is necessary to determine which protein is responsible for the reaction before desensitising can begin.

    Ultimately, a greater understanding of the fundamental origins of allergies should help define new preventive and therapeutic targets in allergic disease.2

    1.  Chigbu D.I. The management of allergic eye diseases in primary eye. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye. December 2009 ; 32 ( 6)  : 260-272.
    2.  Wills-Karp M. et al. New insights into innate immune mechanisms underlying allergenicity free. Mucosal Immunology. December 2010 ; 3  : 104-110.
    3.  Guner S.N. et al. The prevalences of allergic diseases in rural and urban areas are similar. Allergologia et Immunopathologia . January 2011, In Press, Corrected Proof.
    4.  Juniper E. F. et al. Clinical outcomes and adverse effect monitoring in allergic rhinitis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. March 2005 ; 115 ( 3-1) : S390-S413.

Latest Multi Media

A Journey Through the Immune System - in healthy individuals and during diseases.

Allergy and Clinical Immunology Drug Data - A-Z English

Drug Updates

This product is indicated for the symptomatic relief of allergic rhinitis. For the topical treatment of inflamed dermatoses where infection by susceptible organisms and inflammation co-exist, eg intertrigo and infected eczema. Topical treatment of acne vulgaris.

Latest Drug News

Study finds benefits of Xolair for Allergic Asthma treatment - 29-09-2011
New results from the APEX trial of Xolair (omalizumab), from Novartis, show that the drug considerably reduces patients need for steroid use, while at the same time helping disease control and lowering the amount of Asthma exacerbations. Usual treatment for Allergic Astham is oral steroids, but these are associated with weight gain, hypertension, osteoporosis and depression. The data, presented at the 2011 European Respiratory Society congress, shows that in the 12 months after patients started on Xolair (p<0.001), the mean total dose of oral corticosteroids per individual reduced by 34%, with 49% of individuals stopping the oral steroids altogether and 64% considerably reducing their oral corticosteroid dosage. Compared to the previous year, patients experienced a considerable reduction in the amount of asthma exacerbations after 12 months of treatment (53%, 1.7 versus 3.7, 95% CI, p<0.001). Lung function was also found to improve.

Latest Social Media

... to discuss I thought I would throw up a few ideas and see how people react, you can answer any or none or just tell us your experience?1.  Did ...

... to discuss I thought I would throw up a few ideas and see how people react,\` you can answer any or none or just tell us your exoerience?1.  Did ...

... in the first instance, by heal;th visitor +/- speech and language therapist and don't be concerned about being over-reacting - you are not ...

Latest Journal Publications

Enterovirus 71 (EV71) infection may cause severe neurological complications, particularly in young children. Despite the risks, there are still no commercially available EV71 vaccines. Hence, a candidate vaccine construct, containing recombinant Newcastle disease virus capsids that display an EV71 VP1 fragment (NPt-VP11-100) protein, was evaluated in a mouse model of EV71 infection. Previously, it was shown that this protein construct provoked a strong immune response in vaccinated adult rabbits. That study, however, did not address the issue of its effectiveness against EV71 infection in young animals. In the present study, EV71 viral challenge in vaccinated newborn mice resulted in more than 40% increase in survival rate. Significantly, half of the surviving mice fully recovered from their paralysis. Histological analysis of all of the surviving mice revealed a complete clearance of EV71 viral antigens from their brains and spinal cords. In hind limb muscles, the amounts of the antigens detected correlated with the degrees of tissue damage and paralysis. Findings from this study provide evidence that immunization with the NPt-VP11-100 immunogen in a newborn mouse model confers partial protection against EV71 infection, and also highlights the importance of NPt-VP11-100 as a possible candidate vaccine for protection against EV71 infections.
Genotype-specific effects of parvovirus B19 (B19V) infections on left ventricular function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) have not been investigated so far. In this prospective clinical study, the prevalences of B19V genotypes in endomyocardial biopsies from patients presenting with inflammatory heart disease and DCM were determined. A total of 139 consecutive patients were included in the study; among them 53 patients were diagnosed as DCM. Among the total study cohort, B19V DNA was detected in 65 study participants (46.8%). Genotyping of the B19V genomes in the total cohort identified genotype 1 in 38 samples (27.3%), genotype 2 in 25 samples (18.0%), and genotype 3 in only two patients (1.4%). During an average follow-up period of 8 months left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved significantly both in B19V-positive (7.1 ± 13.8%, n = 17, P = 0.038) as well as B19V-negative patients with DCM (9.5 ± 13.9%, n = 20, P = 0.017). However, mean LVEF improved only in patients with genotype 1 (11.0 ± 14.4%, n = 7), whereas it even decreased in patients with genotype 2 (−6.2 ± 6.3%, n = 5, P = 0.033). These data from a small sample of patients diagnosed as DCM suggested that myocardial function during short-time follow-up differed between genetic variants of B19V. Patients with genotype 1 were on average younger than genotype 2 and appeared to be more prone to a beneficial course of left ventricular function than patients with genotype 2. Future studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods will be required to confirm this observation.

Latest Apps

Get Adobe Flash player

Advert for Healthcare Professionals Only

I am a patient (Please go to our patient website)

Disease Topics
eCME
Webcasts
Knowledge Centres
Latest Drug Updates
Quick Search
All Drug Databases
Drug Languages: en it fr de es no nl pt se

Forgotten password?

Allergy and Clinical Immunology